The place to go for the latest medical research from dozens of top academic journals

Aspirin Risks Outweigh Benefits in Chronic Coronary Syndrome

New research reveals that aspirin may do more harm than good for chronic coronary syndrome patients, urging a rethink in common treatment plans.
image-185
Was This Useful?

By CAFMI AI From New England Journal of Medicine

Efficacy of Aspirin Addition in Chronic Coronary Syndrome Patients

In a large-scale randomized controlled trial involving 10,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome on oral anticoagulation, the efficacy of adding aspirin was rigorously evaluated. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite measure including myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular death. Over a median follow-up period of three years, the study found that adding aspirin to oral anticoagulation did not significantly reduce these ischemic events compared to oral anticoagulation alone. This result challenges the common clinical practice of routinely combining aspirin with anticoagulants in this patient population. The lack of significant benefit in the prevention of ischemic outcomes indicates that clinicians should reconsider aspirin use in these scenarios to avoid unnecessary polypharmacy without positively impacting cardiovascular event prevention.

Risks and Safety Concerns: Increased Bleeding with Aspirin

While the study demonstrated no significant ischemic outcome benefit from aspirin, it revealed a marked safety concern: a doubling of major bleeding events among patients receiving aspirin in addition to oral anticoagulation. Major bleeding is a critical complication in patients with chronic coronary syndrome, often leading to hospitalization, transfusions, and heightened morbidity. This safety signal underlines the delicate balance between clot prevention and bleeding risk inherent in combining antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies. The findings suggest careful risk stratification is essential, and many patients could safely discontinue aspirin to reduce bleeding incidence without increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death. This insight is particularly relevant for primary care clinicians and cardiologists managing long-term antithrombotic therapy in an aging population with multiple comorbidities.

Clinical Implications and Practice Recommendations

The trial results have significant clinical implications for guideline development, patient counseling, and primary-care workflows. Given that aspirin addition did not confer ischemic event protection but substantially increased bleeding risk, clinicians should reassess the default use of aspirin in patients receiving oral anticoagulants for chronic coronary syndrome. Careful review of individual patient risk profiles including ischemic risk factors, bleeding history, and comorbid conditions is warranted. Clinical guidelines may evolve to recommend aspirin omission more broadly in this context. Additionally, patient education on the risks and benefits of antithrombotic strategies is essential to support shared decision-making. Regular follow-up to monitor for bleeding signs and to reassess ongoing need for aspirin can enhance safety. By optimizing therapy to balance prevention and harm, healthcare providers can improve outcomes and quality of life for patients with chronic coronary syndrome.


Read The Original Publication Here

Was This Useful?
Clinical Insight
This large randomized trial provides clear evidence that adding aspirin to oral anticoagulation in patients with chronic coronary syndrome does not reduce the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death but significantly increases the risk of major bleeding. For primary care physicians, this finding is crucial as it challenges the routine combination of aspirin with anticoagulants in this population. Avoiding unnecessary aspirin can simplify medication regimens and reduce bleeding complications, which often lead to hospitalization and increased morbidity. The strength of this evidence supports revisiting long-standing prescribing habits and tailoring antithrombotic therapy based on individual patient risk profiles rather than default combination therapy. Integrating these findings into practice involves careful assessment of bleeding versus ischemic risk, patient education on potential harms, and ongoing monitoring, ultimately improving safety and quality of life in a population often burdened by multiple comorbidities and polypharmacy.

Updated On

Published Date

Sign Up for a Weekly Summary of the Latest Academic Research
Share Now

Related Articles

image-548
Innovations and Future in Tricuspid Regurgitation Care
image-544
Blood Thinners vs. Aspirin: Similar Bleeding Risks
image-539
Zerlasiran: Breakthrough Therapy for ASCVD
AI-assisted insights. Always verify with original research